- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 15 November 2016
- Bench
- Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
- Case no.
- CS(COMM) 1207/2016
Judgment
O R D E R %
15.11.2016
¶1This order is in continuation of the earlier orders dated 2nd September, 2016 and 18th October, 2016.
¶2On 2nd September, 2016, when this suit had come up first, questions were raised from the counsel then appearing for the plaintiffs as to the maintainability thereof and for which the counsel for the plaintiffs had sought time to respond. Thereafter, on 18th October, 2016 an adjournment was sought.
¶3Today, Mr. Sudeesh K.K., Advocate, associate of Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Advocate who has filed the suit, appears and states that the plaintiffs have already asked Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Advocate to give a 'No Objection Certificate' (NOC) to the plaintiffs to engage another Advocate and which CS(COMM) 1207/2016
NOC Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Advocate has already issued. He states that he is appearing only because the name of Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Advocate continues to be shown in the Cause List of this Court and otherwise has no instructions from the plaintiffs to appear.
¶4None else appears for the plaintiffs.
¶5Dismissed in default.
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J. NOVEMBER 15, 2016 Bs..
CS(COMM) 1207/2016
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 1207/2016 & IAs No.10778/2016 (u/O 39 R-1&2 CPC), 10779/2016 (for exemption) & 10780/2016 (for condonation of 7 days delay in re-filing) MAHESH CHANDRA & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sudeesh K.K., Adv. for Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Adv. Versus PARAMETRIC TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION INC & ORS ..... Defendants Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.