The Commissionerm,Vat v. M/S T&T Solutions,

VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J

¶1For the reasons stated in S.T. Appeal No. 10/2009 titled as Commissioner, VAT, Trade and Taxes Department vs. International Travel House Ltd., the present appeal is also dismissed. We hold in the facts of the present case that neither the contract in question can be

S.T.APPEAL No. 1/2009

Page 2

artificially split up/severed and also that the possession and control of the vehicles continue to remain with the owner of the vehicles and thus there is no transfer of the right to use the goods as envisaged in Article 366(29A)(d).

¶2The appeal is dismissed leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J

A.K. SIKRI, J September 8, 2009 dkg

S.T.APPEAL No. 1/2009 Page 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + S.T.APPEAL No. 1/2009 Reserved on : August 19, 2009 Pronounced on : September 8, 2009 COMMISSIONER, VAT, TRADE AND TAXES DEPARTMENT ...Appellant Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, ASG with Mr. H.C. Bhatia, Mr. H.L. Taneja, Advocates VERSUS M/s. T. & T. SOLUTIONS ....Respondent Through: Mr. Balram Sanghal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA 1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? %