VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2017 › High Court of Delhi

Asha Jasuja v. Tikam Chand Jaiswal

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
2 November 2017
Bench
Valmiki J. Mehtaauthor
Case no.
FAO 193/2017

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Valmiki J. Mehta

Judgment

O R D E R %

02.11.2017

¶1After arguments, this appeal is disposed of with the consent order, as counsel for the respondent has taken instructions from the respondent, that the respondent/defendant will pay to the appellant/plaintiff charges for use and occupation of the suit premises at Rs.40,000/- per month w.e.f March, 2016 and will continue to pay this amount of Rs.40,000/- per month to the appellant/plaintiff every month pendente lite. In case the amounts due for months of March, 2016 to May, 2016 are shown by the respondent/defendant to have been paid to the appellant/plaintiff through banking instruments which have been encashed, then, the respondent need not pay the amounts for the months of March, 2016 to May, 2016. Arrears FAO No.193/2017 in terms of the present order be paid by the respondent/defendant to the appellant/plaintiff by 31.12.2017 failing which the respondent/defendant will be liable to pay interest @ 15% per annum simple on the arrears to the appellant/plaintiff with the fact that as a consequence of the non-payment the defence of the respondent/defendant, in accordance with law, will be liable to be struck off.

¶2I may clarify that this order is only an interim order and is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties in the suit.

¶3Appeal is accordingly disposed of in terms of aforesaid consent order, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J NOVEMBER 02, 2017 Ne FAO No.193/2017

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 193/2017 ASHA JASUJA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P. Kumar, Advocate. versus TIKAM CHAND JAISWAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.