- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 26 October 2016
- Bench
- S. Muralidhar
- Case no.
- ARB.P. 481/2016
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S. Muralidhar
Judgment
O R D E R %
26.10.2016
¶1The Respondent has been served but none appears on its behalf. The Respondent is set ex parte.
¶2The averment in the petition to the effect that there is an arbitration clause in the agreement between the parties remains uncontroverted.
¶3The Court, accordingly, proposes that Ms. Shomona Khanna, Advocate (Mobile No. 9873665288) be appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to enter upon reference and adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The arbitration shall be conducted under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DAC). The fees of the learned Arbitrator will be in terms of the Delhi High Court Arbitration Centre (Arbitrators' Fees) Rules.
¶4In the first instance, the proposed Arbitrator will make a disclosure to the DAC in terms of Section 11 (8) read with Section 12 (1) of the Act and, ARB.P. 481/2016
thereafter, enter upon reference. DAC will provide to the parties copies of the said disclosure. In the event the disclosure is not made within a reasonable time or such disclosure discloses the inability of the proposed Arbitrator to act as such, it will be open to the parties to apply to this Court for directions.
¶5Subject to compliance with the above direction, Ms. Shomona Khanna will enter upon reference as Arbitrator and proceed with the arbitration by ensuring service of notice upon the Respondent.
¶6The petition is disposed of in the above terms. A copy of this order be delivered forthwith to Ms. Shomona Khanna as well as Additional Coordinator, DAC.
OCTOBER 26, 2016
S. MURALIDHAR, J. b'nesh
ARB.P. 481/2016
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 481/2016 MAHESH PREFAB PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Hemant Kaushik, Advocate. versus AHUJA BUILDERS ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.