Simpli5D Techmologies Pvt. Ltd v. Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited

O R D E R %

15.11.2016

¶1The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act'), inter alia, praying that respondent be restrained from giving effect to or acting on or enforcing the termination notice dated 01.08.2016 issued in respect of the agreement entered into between the parties.

¶2By an order dated 31.08.2016, ad-interim orders were granted in terms of the said prayer till the next date of hearing.

¶3The learned counsel for the parties today state that they are agreeable that a Sole Arbitrator be appointed by this Court to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶4With the consent of the parties, Justice Mukul Mudgal (Retired), former Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court (Mobile No.9818000250) is appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties. This is subject to the Arbitrator making the necessary disclosure and meeting the qualification criteria under section 12 of the Act.

¶5The learned counsel for the respondent states that a policy decision has been taken not to proceed with the pilot project for which the agreement was entered into with the petitioner. He submits that in this view, the order passed on 31.08.2016 be vacated.In view of the fact that the Sole Arbitrator is being appointed, the Arbitrator shall consider the present petition as an application under Section 17 of the Act.

¶6The Interim orders to continue till further orders.The orders passed by this Court shall be subject to further orders that may be passed by the Hon'ble Arbitrator. The parties are at liberty to approach the Arbitrator for an urgent hearing. A copy of the present petition alongwith orders passed shall be filed with the sole arbitrator.

¶7The present petition and the pending application are disposed of.

¶8It is clarified that Sole Arbitrator shall decide the present petition uninfluenced by any observations made in the order dated 31.08.2016.

¶9Dasti. VIBHU BAKHRU, J NOVEMBER 15, 2016/RK

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 344/2016& I.A. 12379/2016 SIMPLI5D TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Jeevesh Nagrath, Advocate. versus INDIAN RAILWAYS CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Ms Divya Prakash Pande and Ms Bhawana Pande, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU