Gandhi Smarak Nidhi v. Anil Dutta Mishra

ORDER

29.05.2017 %? CM(M) 485/2017 CM(M) 486/2017

1.? By filing these two Civil Misc.(Mains), the petitioners have invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the delay in disposal of the applications filed before the learned Trial Court i.e. one application filed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC filed in Civil Suit No.615464/2016 titled as 'Gandhi Smarak Sangharalaya Samiti vs. Dr.A nil Dutta Mishra' and another application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC filed in Civil Suit No.615373/2016 titled as 'Dr.A nil dutta Mishra s. Gandhi Smarak Sanghralaya Samiti & Ors.', which have been pending for orders for a long time.

2.? The prayer made in CM(M) No.485/2017 is that directions may be issued to learned ADJ-07, Central District to pass orders on the application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC filed in Civil Suit No.615464/2016, arguments on which have been heard and kept for orders on 26' October, 2016. CM(M) No.486/2017 has been filed by the petitioners praying for issuance of directions to learned ADJ-07, Central District to pass orders on the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC filed in Civil Suit No.615373/2016, arguments on which have been heard and kept for orders 26th on October, 2016. Mr.A.K.Singla, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the arguments on the above noted two applications were concluded on 26th October, 2016. Since then the orders on the applications have not been pronounced and the applications are simply adjourned on several dates of hearing i.e. 9.11.2016, 8.12.2016, 22.12.2016, 20.01.2017, 03.02.2017,

11.02.2017, 25.02.20 17 by fixing the matters for "clarification/orders". Mr.A.K.Singla, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that when the orders on the applications under Order XII Rule 6 CPC and under Order VII Rule 11 CPC have been repeatedly deferred from 91h 25th November, 2016 till February, 2017, the petitioners were compelled to Page 2 of 4 CM(M) Nos. 485 & 486 of 2017 ? file CM(M) No.331/2017. However, the said Civil Misc.(Mains) No.3 3 1/20 17 was withdrawn for the reason that the Court had fixed the date 28th March, 2017 in the hope that the application would be of hearing as disposed of. The petitioners continued waiting for the orders on the 281h application but the matters have been deferred from March, 2017 to 11th th 9th April, 2017, thereafter to 25 April, 2017 and then to May, 2017. In the given circumstances, the petitioners are again constrained to approach this Court for issuance of directions to the learned ADJ-07, Central District, for speedy disposal of the applications. 5th Vide order dated May, 2017, a report was called in sealed cover from the learned ADJ-07, Central District, Tis Hazari, Delhi about the reason for not being able to dispose of the application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in Civil Suit No.615464/2016 and application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Civil Suit No.615373/2016. Today report has been received from learned ADJ-07, Central• District, Tis Hazari, Delhi to the effect that he has taken over as ADJ-07, 16th Central District on May, 2017 pursuant to the transfer/posting orders 151h No.12/Delhi High Court/Gaz./G-1/VI.E.2(a)/2017 dated May, 2017. It is also assured that he will make best efforts to dispose of the applications at 151h July, 2017 for arguments. the earliest which are now listed for In view of the report received, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw both the petitions. Accordingly, both the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. It is hoped and expected that the application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC filed in Civil Suit No.615464/2016 and application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC filed in Civil Suit No.615373/2016 shall be disposed of by learned ADJ-07, Central District, Tis Hazari, Delhi within three months 15th July, 2017 when the above two civil from the next date of hearing i.e. suits are coming up for hearing before the learned Trial Court. A copy of this order be sent to the learned ADJ-07, Central District, 11.? Tis Hazari Court, Delhi for information and compliance and be also given dasti to learned counsel for the petitioners, as prayed. CM No.16702/2017 in CM(M) No.485/2017 CM No.16704/2017 in CM(M)No.486/2017 Dismissed as infructuous. .1, P? TIBHA RANI, . MAY 299 2017 'st' ? Page 4 of 4 CM(M) Nos.485 & 486 of201 7

? H COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI )17 GANDHI SMARAK NIDHI? Petitioner Through: Mr.A.K. Singla, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Rahul Shukia, Advocate. versus ANIL DUTTA MISHRA? Respondent Through: None. AND .? +? CM(M) 486/2017 GANDHI SMARAK SANGHARALAYA SAMITI & ANR Petitioners ? Through: Mr.A.K.Singla, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Rahul Shukia, Advocate. versus DR ANIL DUTTA MISHRA? Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RAN!