- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 10 November 2016
- Bench
- Vipin Sanghi
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 2642/2016
Judgment
O R D E R %
10.11.2016
The nominal roll has been received. The same shows that the petitioner has been released on furlough on three occasions between
28.01.2016 and 18.02.2016; 07.07.2016 and 21.07.2016; 05.08.2016 and
19.08.2016. He has also been released on parole between 08.04.2016 and
06.05.2016. Thus, the petitioner has remained out of jail for about 11 weeks in the year 2016 itself.
In these circumstances, I am not inclined to grant parole to the petitioner at this stage. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to apply for fresh parole/ furlough under the guidelines in the next year.
VIPIN SANGHI, J NOVEMBER 10, 2016 sr
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2642/2016 & Crl.M.A. No.14151/2016 DEVRAJ @ DEVOO ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Malhotra, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Adv for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with SI Vishram Meena, PS IGI Airport CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.