VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Babloo v. State

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
26 October 2016
Bench
Sangita Dhingra Sehgalauthor
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 2646/2016

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Sangita Dhingra Sehgal

Judgment

O R D E R %

10.08.2017

Crl. M.A. No. 6776/2017 (modification)

Vide order dated 26.10.2016, the petitioner was granted parole for four weeks subject to furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/CMM/Duty Magistrate. Thereafter, the petitioner had moved an application for reduction of the surety bond amount and vide order dated 08.02.2017, the surety bond amount (Rs.25,000/-) was reduced to Rs.10,000/-. Thereafter, the present application has been moved for modification of order dated 08.02.2017 to accept surety in cash. Keeping the facts and circumstances, no ground is made out. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed.

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J AUGUST 10, 2017/ssc

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2646/2016 BABLOO ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Tarun Khanna & Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State with SI Deepak Kumar from Police Station-Kotwali. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.