- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 5 November 2024
- Bench
- Anish Dayal
- Case no.
- CRL.REV.P. 491/2015
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Anish Dayal
Judgment
O R D E R %
05.11.2024
¶1This petition has been filed by the State challenging discharge of accused/ respondents under Section 397 IPC in FIR No. 259/2014 PS Dabri. The FIR was originally registered under Sections 392/411/397/34 IPC, however, by impugned order dated 4th September 2014, passed by the ASJ, Dwarka, petitioners were discharged from the offence punishable under Section 397 IPC, on the basis that no recovery of any weapon, was effected from them.
¶2It transpires on perusing the TCR that petitioners (respondents herein) had been acquitted of the offences charged with.
¶3Accordingly, in the opinion of this Court, nothing further survives, This is a digitally signed order. considering that charge under Section 397 IPC, would also be effectively based on aspect of robbery under section 392 IPC.
¶4Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed.
¶5Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J NOVEMBER 5, 2024/sm This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 491/2015 STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for State SI Deepak PS Dabri & ASI Mangtu Ram PS Dwarka Sector 23 versus PRINCE & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aditya Sharma & Mr. Rajat Aneja, Advocates (as Amicus Curiae) for R-1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.