- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 10 November 2016
- Bench
- Valmiki J. Mehta
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 8290/2016
Judgment
O R D E R %
10.11.2016
¶1Learned senior counsel for the petitioner states that certain additional grounds, which have factual basis, have by inadvertence not being mentioned as part of cause of action in the writ petition, and therefore, liberty is prayed to withdraw this petition and file a fresh petition on the same cause of action by including grounds stated not only in this petition but also other additional grounds. W.P.(C) No.8290/2016
¶2Writ petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J NOVEMBER 10, 2016 Ne W.P.(C) No.8290/2016
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8290/2016 and C.M. Nos.34312/2016 (directions), 34313/2016 (exemption) & 38676/2016 (for filing additional documents) ALKA PAHUJA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC for respondent No.1. Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. Romy Chacko, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.