VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

M/S Kollam Internet Cable Distribution Pvt. Ltd v. Union of India & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
9 November 2016
Bench
Sanjeev Sachdevaauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 9037/2016

Judgment

JUDGMENT

09.11.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

W.P.(C) 9034/2016

¶1The petition has been filed seeking grant of time for installing the set-top boxes and till the completion of installation of set top boxes, the respondent be restrained from stopping the supply of analogue signal.

¶2The Ministry of Information & Broadcasting by Notification dated

11.11.2011 had, in public interest, notified that it shall be obligatory for every cable operator to transmit or re-transmit programmes of any channel in an encrypted form through a Digital Addressable System

(DAS) in such cities, towns or areas, as specified in table contained

therein.

¶3Effective dates ranged between 30.06.2012 to 31.12.2014. The said period of implementation was subsequently extended from time to time and the last extension for the implementation of DAS Phase-III was granted upto 31.12.2015. The petitioner admittedly is part of the Phase-III implementation of the digital system.

¶4The contention of the petitioner is that sufficient set top boxes are not available in the area of the petitioner to changeover to digital system.

¶5Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that sufficient set top boxes are readily available in the open market and even through the cable operators and vendors. He further contends that originally digital set top boxes were being imported but now they are being indigenously manufactured by several manufacturers in the country and are available in abundance. He submits that there is no shortage of digital set top boxes.

¶6Perusal of the petition shows that the petitioner is only seeking for grant of time till 31.03.2016 for installation of digital set top boxes and for change over to DAS.

¶7The notification was issued by the Government on 11.11.2011. Nearly five years have elapsed from the said date when the cable operators were made aware that they have to changeover to DAS. The petition was filed in January, 2016 and now we are in November. The petitioners have already got sufficient time to complete the installation of

set top boxes and the changeover to DAS. Even post the filing of the present petition, approximately ten months have passed. There is no further justification in granting the petitioner any more time for completion of installation of digital set top boxes and changeover to DAS.

¶8The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No orders as to Costs.

¶9The petitioner shall ensure that all analogue connections are converted to digital by installation of digital set top boxes by 24th November, 2016. The petitioner shall duly inform the subscribers that on expiry of the said period, all analogue signals would be discontinued and the subscribers will be required to switch over from the analogue mode of transmission to digital mode of transmission on or before the cut-off date. To facilitate the change-over, the petitioner shall also display a scroll, in all analogue channels being transmitted by them, informing the subscribers that they have to change over to digital system within the stipulated timeframe. Dasti under signatures of Court Master.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J NOVEMBER 09, 2016/st

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 09.11.2016 + W.P.(C) 9037/2016 M/S KOLLAM INTERNET CABLE DISTRIBUTION PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Tushar Singh with Mr. Mayank Mihir Sagar, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Kirtiman Singh with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocates for TRAI. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker with Mr. Gajendra K., Advocates for the State of Kerela. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.