VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2019 › High Court of Delhi

L and T Hydrocarbon Engineering Ltd v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. and Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
15 January 2019
Bench
S. Ravindra Bhat, Prateek Jalanauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 9151/2018

Judgment

order as to costs.

PRATEEK JALAN, J

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J JANUARY 15, 2019 "pv"

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 22nd November, 2018 Pronounced on: 15th January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 9151/2018 with CM APPL. 35293/2018, CM APPL. 47952/2018 & CM APPL. 47954/2018 L AND T HYDROCARBON ENGINEERING LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Rishi Agrawala, Mr. Karan Luthra & Ms.Nidhi Ram, Advs. versus OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv.with Mr.Sunil K. Jain & Mr.Punya Garg, Advs. Mr.Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Manu Seshadri, Mr. Arjun Syal, Mr.Samarth Chowdhary, Ms.Tanvi Rana, Mr.Shreyan Das, Ms.Mitali Chauhan & Ms.Sakshi, Advs. for R-2. Mr.Aryama Sundaram, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rahul P. Dave & Mr.Sumit Chopra, Advs. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN MR.JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % 1. This writ petition concerns a tender floated by the first respondent, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.(hereinafter, "ONGC") for the design, engineering, construction, fabrication, installation and commissioning of various facilities (including a Central Processing Platform and Living Quarters and Utilities) at one of its offshore platforms. The petitioner, L&T Hydrocarbon Engineering Ltd. (hereinafter, "L&T") is part of a consortium (with the fourth respondent, McDermott Asia Pacific Pvt. Ltd.) which participated in the tender. The second and third respondents, Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. (hereinafter, "Afcons") and Sapura Fabrication SDN BHD (hereinafter, "Sapura") formed another consortium. By way of this petition, L&T contends that the Afcons/ Sapura consortium (hereinafter, "ASC") was not technically qualified to participate in the tender, and its bid ought to have been rejected at the threshold. 2. The tender was issued on 24.11.2016, and amended on 06.04.2017 in accordance with circulars dated 01.03.2017 and 03.04.2017 issued by ONGC. Three parties (the petitioner's consortium, ASC and one other bidder) participated. (Although the petitioner's bid was initially not accepted, it was ultimately permitted to participate by virtue of an order of this Court dated 25.05.2018 in W.P. (C) No. 1429 of 2018.) By a letter dated 28.08.2018, ONGC stated that the petitioner's consortium and ASC had been shortlisted for opening of their price bids. This communication has been challenged by L&T in the present petition. 3. The stipulation of the tender documents relevant for the adjudication of this petition are referred to below: (a) Clause 14.1 of the Instructions to Bidders: "14.0 EXPERIENCE/CAPABILITY OF THE BIDDER 14.1 TECHNICAL Bidder is required to comply with the requirements of Section A-2 of Bid Evaluation Criteria at Appendix-A6 for this section. The bidder shall submit the documentary evidence in support of his experience/capability as required above along with technocontractual (Unpriced) bid." (b) Clause 23.1 and 23.2 of the Instructions to Bidders: "23.0 EVALUATION 23.1 The Company wishes to finalize the award of work of the facilities covered under this Bidding Documents within a limited time schedule. ONGC expects bidders to confirm compliance to tender term, conditions & Specifications, which shall stand frozen after Pre-Bid Conference, failing which the Bids are liable to be rejected. Hence the bidders in their own interest are advised to submit their bids complete in all respects conforming to all terms and conditions of the bid document. Bids shall be evaluated based on the information/documents available in the bid. Hence bidders are advised to ensure that they submit appropriate and relevant supporting documentation along with their proposal in the first instance itself. Bids not complying to the requirements of bid documents are liable to be rejected. Bidders are advised to fill up Appendix A-9 carefully and provide reference to all relevant documents given in their bid offer. Bidders are advised to note that the sub-contractors/ agencies/barges listed in the bidder"

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.