- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 8 November 2017
- Bench
- A.K. Pathak
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 2299/2017
Judgment
O R D E R %
08.11.2017 Respondent no. 2 is present in Court and has been identified by SI Veerpal Singh of Police Station Tilak Nagar. Respondent no. 2 says that she has settled the matter with the petitioner before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi on 30th May, 2013 and since then, she is living with the petitioner. She submits that she is not willing to pursue the FIR any further and the same may be quashed. Keeping in mind that petitioner (husband) and respondent no. 2 (wife) are living together for the last four years after resolving their differences, in my view, no fruitful purpose would be served to keep the criminal proceedings pending. Accordingly, in the interest of justice FIR no. 243/2013 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Tilak Nagar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
A.K. PATHAK, J. NOVEMBER 08, 2017 r.bararia
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2299/2017 SUNIL GROVER ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sarvesh Singh and Mr. K.K. Singh, Advs. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. M.S. Oberoi, APP with SI Veerpal Singh, P.S. Tilak Nagar for the respondent no. 1 Respondent no. 2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.