VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2017 › High Court of Delhi

Bira Ram v. The Competent Authority, Delhi

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
1 November 2017
Bench
Vibhu Bakhruauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 9504/2017

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Vibhu Bakhru

Judgment

ORDER %

01.11.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. • ,/ petitions with liberty to make a representation to the Competent Authority. He states that the only reason why the Competent Authority has passed the order is that the documents filed by the petitioners were in Gurumukhi and their translations were not provided. He states that he will submit the translated copies of the relevant documents and endeavour to pursuade the Competent Authority to examine the same.

¶2The petitions along with pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn. VIBHU BAKHRU, J NOVEMBER 01,2017 nd

Case details

Parties and counsel

tiV / * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.fCI 9504/2017 & CM No. 38627-38629/2017 BIRARAM Petitioner Through; Mr. M.K. Ghosh with Mr. Mohinder Singh and Mr. Rohit Dutta, Advocates versus THOE COMPETENT AUTHORITY, DELHI Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for UOI + W.P.(CI 9507/2017 & CM No. 38633-38635/2017 AMARJITKAUR Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Ghosh with Mr. Mohinder Singh and Mr. Rohit Dutta, Advocates versus THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY, DELHI Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.