- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 31 October 2017
- Bench
- Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
- Case no.
- TR.P.(C.) 92/2017
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
Judgment
O R D E R %
31.10.2017
¶1Transfer, invoking Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is sought of CS DJ/0210742/2016 (earlier CS(OS) No.808/2008) and CS DJ/0210744/2016 (earlier CS(OS) No.378/2009).
¶2Notice of this transfer petition was ordered to be issued and the counsel for the respondent No.1 appears. None appears for the respondents No.2 to 4 despite service.
¶3The counsel for the petitioner is totally unprepared and has also not filed any pleadings in the pending suits of which transfer is sought, wherefrom the nature thereof can be gauged. So much so, even the particulars of the Court where the suits are pending are not available and have also not been pleaded.
¶4The petition is rejected.
¶5If the petitioner files another transfer petition, the same would be allowed on the condition of the petitioner therewith filing a copy of the present petition and a copy of this order in this petition.
I am refraining from imposing costs.
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J. OCTOBER 31, 2017/bs..
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TR.P.(C.) 92/2017 PROMOD BHASIN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Mehta, Adv. Versus VINOD BHASIN & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.