VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2015 › High Court of Delhi

Microsoft Corporation & Ors v. Satish Parakh & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
2 September 2015
Bench
Hima Kohliauthor
Case no.
CS(OS) 1563/2015

Judgment

HIMA KOHLI, J. (Oral)

I.A.No. 18328/2015 (joint application u/O XXIII R 3 CPC)

¶1At the outset, counsel for the plaintiffs states, on instructions, that he may be permitted to withdraw the suit against defendants No.3 to 10 and confine the same to the defendants No.1 & 2. Ordered accordingly.

¶2The present application has been jointly filed by the parties stating inter alia that during the pendency of the suit, they have arrived at an out of court negotiated settlement. The terms and conditions of the settlement arrived at between the plaintiff and the defendants No.1 & 2 have been set out in paras 1 to 6 of the

application, whereunder the defendants No.1 & 2 have acknowledged that the plaintiffs are the owners/proprietors of all intellectual property rights in various software programmes developed by them. The defendants have also undertaken to pay a sum of Rs.11.00 lacs to the plaintiffs towards litigation expenses. Learned counsel for the defendants hands over a cheque bearing No.93622322 dated 4.8.2015 drawn on AXIS Bank, Sir M.P. Road, Mumbai in favour of the counsel for the plaintiff in the sum of Rs.11.00 lacs, which has been duly accepted by the other side. The defendants No.1 & 2 have also given some undertakings to the plaintiff as recorded in para 6 of the application and in lieu of the said undertakings, the plaintiffs have agreed to forego the claim of rendition of accounts against the defendants in terms of the prayers made in para 57(a) & (b) of the plaint.

¶3Counsels for the parties state that the suit may be decreed in terms of the settlement.

¶4The Court has perused the present application. The same has been signed by the constituted attorneys/authorised signatories of the plaintiff and the defendants No.1 & 2 and their respective counsels. The application is supported by the affidavits of the signatories to the application.

¶5As counsels for the parties jointly state that their clients have arrived at the aforesaid settlement of their own free will and volition and without any undue influence or coercion from any quarters, there appears no legal impediment in accepting the said settlement. The parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement recorded in the present application.

¶6The suit is decreed in terms of the settlement recorded in the application, while leaving the parties to bear their own expenses. Decree Sheet be drawn accordingly.

¶7The suit is disposed of along with the pending application.

¶8File be consigned to the record room.

(HIMA KOHLI) SEPTEMBER 02, 2015

JUDGE sk/ap

Case details

Parties and counsel

35. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1563/2015 & IA No.11361/2015 Decided on 02.09.2015 IN THE MATTER OF: MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through : Mr. Ravin Galgotia, Advocate versus SATISH PARAKH & ORS ..... Defendants Through : Ms. Ankita Jain, Advocate for D-1 & 2. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.