- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 9 September 2015
- Bench
- S.P.Garg
- Case no.
- BAIL APPLN. 1049/2015
Judgment
ORDER %
09.09.2015
¶1Statusreportfiled.It istakenonrecord.
¶2LearnedAPP states that the petitionershave since joinedthe investigation.Natureofinjuriessustainedby the victimis 'simple'.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitionersstates that the matter has been settledbetweenthe partiesamicablyand cross-FIRhas already beenquashedbyHMJIndermeetKaur. BAILAPPLN.1049/2015&1050/2015 page1of2 1-'
¶4It is further stated that the quashing of the present FIR is hsted beforethe Benchof JusticeP.S.Tejion 21®' September,2015.
¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitionersare grantedanticipatorybail and in the event of arrest,they be released on furnishingpersonal bond in the sum of? 30,000/- with one surety in the like amount each to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigatingofficer.They shall, however,join the investigation as and when required.
¶6The bail applicationsstand disposed of xl^P.GARG,J SEPTEMBER 09, 2015 / tr BAILAPPLN. 1049/2015&1050/2015 page 2 of2
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-3 & 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1049/2015 RAKESH Petitioner Through: Mr.RavindraNarayan,Advocate. versus STATE OF NOT OF DELHI Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Ahlawat, APP. AND + BAIL APPLN. 1050/2015 AJIT@AMIT Petitioner Through: Mr.RavindraNarayan,Advocate. versus STATEOF NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through: Mr.AmitAhlawat,APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.