- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 8 November 2016
- Bench
- A.K. Pathak
- Case no.
- CRL.REV.P. 717/2016
Judgment
O R D E R %
08.11.2016 By this revision petition, petitioner has assailed the order dated 12th August, 2016 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi, whereby application under Section 142 (b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 has been dismissed. As a matter of propriety, petitioner should approach the Sessions Court at the first instance. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the Sessions Court. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. In case revision petition is filed before the Sessions Judge within two weeks from today, the same shall be heard and disposed of on merits without going into the question of limitation. Dasti.
A.K. PATHAK, J. NOVEMBER 08, 2016 rb
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 717/2016 & Crl. M.A. No. 17345/2016 FIITJEE LTD ..... Petitioner Through :Mr. Neeraj Malhotra and Mr. Rupal Luthra, Advs. versus VIPIN KUMAR ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.