VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

M/S Jaipur Ipl Cricket Pvt. Ltd v. Union of India & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
15 November 2016
Bench
Sanjeev Sachdevaauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 9885/2016

Judgment

O R D E R %

15.11.2016 CM No. 40861/2016 (for correction) This is an application seeking correction of the typographical error in order dated 26.10.2016. It is noted that in order dated 26.10.2016 it has been recorded that the appeal is listed on 10.11.2016. It is contended that the date of listing of the appeal is

16.11.2016 and on account of the typographical error the same has been noted as 10.11.2016. Further, it is contended that counsel for the respondent had appeared not only for respondent no. 1 but also for respondent no. 3. In view of the above, the order dated 26.10.2016 is corrected. The next date of the listing of the appeal is corrected to read as

16.11.2016 instead of 10.11.2016 and presence of Mr. Vikram Jetly, advocate in the said order shall be read for respondent no. 1 and 3. Perusal of order sheet of the appeal shows that the final W.P.(C) 9885/2016 Page 2 arguments in the appeal were concluded on 02.02.2016 and judgment was reserved. The judgment could not be delivered. Thereafter again arguments were heard on 26.07.2016 and the judgment was reserved. Thereafter the Chairman has since demitted office. The appeal is listed for hearing tomorrow i.e. 16.11.2016. It is directed that the appellate tribunal shall dispose of the appeal expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the conclusion of the final arguments. The writ petition along with applications are disposed of with the above directions. Copy of the order be given dasti under signature of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J NOVEMBER 15, 2016 'rs'

Case details

Parties and counsel

W.P.(C) 9885/2016 Page 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9885/2016 M/S JAIPUR IPL CRICKET PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Amar Dave, Mr. Deep Roy and Mr. Udit Jain, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC for R-1 to 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.