- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 7 November 2016
- Bench
- Sunita Gupta
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 10348/2016
Judgment
ORDER %
07.11.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner corporation, on instructions, states that the corporation is agreeable to the following:
(i) The corporation will permit the respondents to join India Trade Promotion Organization (ITPO).
(ii) The respondents would be entitled to retain their lien with the Delhi Transport Corporation for a period of one year and on or before the said date, the respondents would submit their technical resignations.
(iii) Cyan Prakash (respondent in W.P.(C) No.10347/2016 is in occupation of staff quarter. He shall vacate the staff quarter within Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. one month from the date he joins ITPO on deputation. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, states that condition no.(iii) is acceptable to Gyan Prakash. With regard to condition no. (ii), it is submitted that the period of probation has not been specified by the ITPO. Learned counsel for the respondents states that in case ITPO want to extend' the period of probation beyond one year, the respondents will approach the petitioner corporation for appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the petitioner corporation on instructions from Mr S. Chandra, Depot Manager, has accepted the said suggestion. In view of and recording the aforesaid statement, the writ petitions are disposed of. The petitioner corporation would issue necessary orders / papers within a period of one week from today. Learned counsel for the respondents states that in view of the order passed today, he would not press the contempt petitions. The counsel for the respondents will file a copy of this order with the ITPO. SANJIV KHANNA, J Wv-SUNITA GUPTA, J NOVEMBER 07, 2016/rrf
Case details
Parties and counsel
$^43 -44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10347/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Petitioner Through Mr Anshuj Dhingra and Mr Harbhajan Singh, Advs. versus GYANPRAKASH Respondent Through Mr T.D. Yadav, Adv. + W.P.(C) 10348/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Petitioner Through Mr Anshuj Dhingra and Mr Harbhajan Singh, Advs. versus KESHA RAM Respondent Through Mr-T.D. Yadav, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANHV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.