- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 26 October 2016
- Bench
- Indermeet Kaur
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 10116/2016
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Indermeet Kaur
Judgment
O R D E R %
26.10.2016
The petitioner before this Court is the son of deceased Smt. Raj Kaur. Raj Kaur was stated to be a squatter at Bangla Sahib, Ashoka Road.
By way of this petition, the petitioner who is the son of deceased seeks substitution qua his deceased mother.
On advance notice, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 has put an appearance. His submission is that after the promulgation of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, the case of the petitioner can only be considered by the Town Vending Committee (TVC). It is not in dispute that the TVC qua respondent No. 1/New Delhi Municipal Council has since been constituted.
This petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the TVC.
Order dasti.
INDERMEET KAUR, J OCTOBER 26, 2016 A
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10116/2016 & C.M. No.40095/2016 LAKHAVINDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Sahu and Mr. S.B. Sahoo, Advs. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC and Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advs for NDMC. Mr. Sanjay Ghose, Mr. Rhishabh Jetley and Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Advs for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.