VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Veena Saini v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
11 November 2016
Bench
Indermeet Kaurauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 10711/2016

Judgment

O R D E R %

11.11.2016

Petitioner is aggrieved by the illegal and unauthorized construction which is being permitted at property No.28, Jangpura Road, Bhogal, New Delhi. Submission is that this activity of the private respondent/respondent no.3 is illegal. On advance notice, learned counsel for respondent no.1/SDMC has put in appearance. Her submission is that this property already stands booked on 05.9.2016 i.e. basement and the ground floor and the column on the first floor. On 01.11.2016, the first floor, second and third floor of the aforenoted property has been booked. Work stop notice was issued on 07.11.2016. Sealing action has been initiated. Learned counsel for respondent no.1 submits that all actions in accordance with law shall be taken. It is hoped and expected that the action as has been noted herein above will be taken in accordance with law by the respondent. No further orders are called for in this petition. Petition disposed of.

INDERMEET KAUR, J

NOVEMBER 11, 2016 ndn

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10711/2016 VEENA SAINI ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Hassibuddin, Advocate. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms.Reema Khorana, Advocate for R-1/SDMC. Mr.Akshay Choudhary for Mr. Raman Duggal, Advocate for R-2. Mr.Varun Nishchal, Advocate for Delhi Police with SI Annuj Kadian from P.S. Nizamuddin. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.