VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Brijmohan Ramapurath v. Chhaya M Sontakki

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
27 October 2016
Bench
Pradeep Nandrajogauthor, Pratibha Rani
Case no.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 158/2016

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Pradeep NandrajogFollow Pratibha Rani

Judgment

O R D E R %

27.10.2016

CM 40411/2016

Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM 40412/2016

¶1For the reasons mentioned in the application 151 days' delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

¶2The application is disposed of. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 158/2016

¶1Learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the appeal stating that since under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 no declaratory relief can be sought that there exists no marriage between the appellant and the respondent and the remedy is to file a suit for declaration. Seeking leave to withdraw the appeal counsel states that the appellant would be moving an application withdrawing HMA No. 596/2012 so that the appellant can avail the remedy of a suit for declaration. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 158/2016

¶2The appeal is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.

¶3No costs.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

PRATIBHA RANI, J. OCTOBER 27, 2016 'hkaur'

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 158/2016 BRIJMOHAN RAMAPURATH ..... Appellant Represented by: Md.Azam Ansari, Advocate versus CHHAYA M SONTAKKI ..... Respondent Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.