- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 27 October 2016
- Bench
- A.K. Pathak
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 3152/2016
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow A.K. Pathak
Judgment
O R D E R %
27.10.2016 Crl.M.A.16931/2016 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 3152/2016 Petitioner nos.2 to 10 are the relatives of petitioner no.1. Respondent no.2 and petitioner no.2 have settled their disputes amicably. Petitioner no.1 has pronounced talaaq . Talaaqnama has already been executed. Respondent no.2 is present in Court and admits having settled the matter with petitioner no.1. She further submits that she has received the entire settled amount of `10 Lakhs and is not willing to pursue the FIR any further. Keeping in mind the facts that petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have settled their disputes amicably, inasmuch as respondent no.2 does not wish to pursue the FIR any further and their marriage has already been dissolved, in the interest of justice, FIR No.613/2014 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at police station Sangam Vihar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom, are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
A.K. PATHAK, J. OCTOBER 27, 2016/dk
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3152/2016 ANISUDDIN & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through : Mr. Abhishek Paruthi, Adv. for Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv. with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC and Ms. Mallika Parmar, Adv. with PSI Rajesh Yadav PS Sangam Vihar. Mr. Saleem Malik, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.