- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 27 October 2016
- Bench
- Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
- Case no.
- LPA 595/2016
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
Judgment
O R D E R %
27.10.2016 CM No.40438/2016 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. LPA No.595/2016 & CM No.40437/2016 (stay) Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties, we do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the order under appeal. As rightly held by the learned Single Judge, the impugned show-cause notice does not give an impression that there is a pre-meditated mind insofar as the action proposed to be taken against the petitioner/appellant herein. Hence, the interference by us is not warranted. The appeal is accordingly disposed of placing on record the statement of Shri Sanjeev Narula, the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Central Government appearing for the respondent that the inquiry is yet to be conducted by the Inquiry Officer appointed under the show-cause notice and that the reference to 'inquiry report' in Para 26 of the impugned show-cause notice is of no consequence. CHIEF JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J OCTOBER 27, 2016 kks
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 595/2016 M/S KVS CARGO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Priyadarshi Manish with Ms. Anjali J. Manish, Advs. Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (GENERAL), NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.