Urmila Yadav v. Commissioner of Delhi Police

ORDER % i

29.10.2016 C.M.No.40728/2016 (Exemption^ , Exemption allowed, subjects alljust exceptions. W.P.(C) 10364/2016 & C.M.No.40727/2016 rStav) Leaned Senior counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the appellate authority by an appeal under section 6 (F) of the Explosive Act, 1884. Learned Senior counsel for petitioner submits that since it is Diwali season and the petitioner has been given licence for sale of fire crackers only till 01®^ of November,2016, in case the appealis not heard and decidedby the Appellate Authority (i.e. Joint Commissioner (Licensing) today itself. Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. the entire matter wo^uld become infructuous and the petitioner who is an aged lady would suffer substantialfinancial loss. ' In view of the aboVe, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with libertyto the"petitionerto file an appeal with the AppellateAuthority.On the appeal being filed, the appellate authority shall hear and decide the appeal today itself If for any reason, the appeal cannot be taken up for disposal today, the Appellate Authority shall dispose of the same by 12 Noon tomorrow. Dasti to both parties under the signature of Court Master. SA]>(aEEVSACHDEVA,X (Vacation Judge) OCTOBER 29,2016 neelam/dsri- . \ •

•H- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10364/2016 URMILAYADAV ....".Petitioner Through; Mr. Kqka Raghava Rao, Sri Advocate with Mr. Tarun Sharma, Ms. Boudh Prabha and ' Ms. Aakansha Kapoor, Advs. - • versus COMMISSIONER OF DELHI POLICE Respondent Through: Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, Adv. with Mr. Hem Kumar, Adv. , SI-Giri Raj, P;S. Des Bandhu Gupta Road, Delhi.: , CORAM: HON'BLE Mr. JUmCE SANJEEV SACHDEVA