Farzana Begum v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation (Sdmc) & Ors

O R D E R %

11.11.2016

Petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that his representation dated

21.9.2016 has not been addressed. Her submission is that illegal and unauthorized construction is being permitted at property No.276 & 288, Nizam Nagar, Nizamuddin, New Delhi which has damaged the property of the petitioner which is adjacent to the said property.

On advance notice, learned counsel for respondent has put in appearance. Her submission is that the aforenoted property is an old property and at present no construction is going on. Learned counsel for respondent undertakes to ensure that the representation of the petitioner shall be answered in accordance with law. Needful be done in four weeks.

Needless to state that the private respondents who will be affected by the action of the Department shall be notified before action is taken.

No further orders are called for.

Petition disposed of.

INDERMEET KAUR, J

NOVEMBER 11, 2016 ndn

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10744/2016 & C.M. No.42036/2016 FARZANA BEGUM ..... Petitioner Through Ms.Ananya Roy and Mr.Sohit Chaudhary, Advocate. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (SDMC) & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms.Arti Bansa, Advocate for SDMC/R-1. Mr.Sumit Aggarwal and Mr.Mukesh Sachdeva, Advocate for R-2 with SI Ashok Kumar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR