Puneet Yadav & Anr v. State

O R D E R %

10.11.2016 Crl. M.A. No. 17500/2016 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 2295/2016

¶1Issue notice.

¶2Learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.

¶3The petitioners i.e. Puneet Yadav @ Pintu and Navinder @ Navin Master prayed for interim bail for a period of 1½ months on the ground that their sister was to get married on 1st December, 2016 and the functions are starting from 20th November, 2016.

¶4The learned Additional Sessions Judge vide order dated 24th October, 2016 has granted interim bail w.e.f. 28th November, 2016 till 7th December, 2016, subject to the conditions laid therein. BAIL APPLN. 2295/2016

¶5The prayer of the petitioners is limited that instead of 28th November, they be released prior to 20th November, 2016 so that they could attend the Tilak ceremony of their sister which is fixed on 20th November, 2016.

¶6Learned APP for the State submits that it has been verified that function of Tilak of the sister of the petitioners is fixed on 20th November, 2016.

¶7Considering the fact verified, I deem it fit to modify the order dated 24th October, 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. It is, therefore, directed that the petitioners be released on interim bail w.e.f. 18th November, 2016 till 7th December, 2016 subject to the conditions imposed in the order dated 24th October, 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge.

¶8Petition is disposed of.

¶9Order dasti.

MUKTA GUPTA, J. NOVEMBER 10, 2016 'vn'

BAIL APPLN. 2295/2016

27# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2295/2016 PUNEET YADAV & ANR. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Brahm Prakash, PS Ranhola. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA