Pawan Kumar Periwal v. Rajeev Sharma & Ors

ORDER %

02.11.2017

¶1Afterhearmgcounselsfor theparties,it is notedthatthe subject r suits pertain to, immovable properties and therefore Section 52 of the Transferof PropertyAct, 1882 containingthe doctrineof lis pendens will come intoplay in favourofthe appellants/plaintiffs.Accordinglyif there is any transfer of the, suit propertiesby the defendantsin the suits, then, the same will be subjectto the doctrineof lispendenscontainedin Section52 of the TransferofPropertyAct and the defendants,if they transfertheirrights in the suit properties,then, they will intimatethe plaintiffson transferring the suit properties.

¶2Nothing contained in today's order is a reflection on merits of the cases of eitherofthe partiesand whichwill be decidedby the trial court in accordance with law. Impugned orders which are challenged in the . appealswill accordinglystandsubjectto aforesaidobservations. 3-Appeals are accordingly disposed of in terms of aforesaid observations. VALMIKIJ.MEHTA,J NOVEMBER 02, 2017 Ne

$-9 and 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 600/2016and C.M: No.47531/2016(stay) SHALINITAICKAR Appellant Through: Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary, Advocate with Mr. Yogesh Kumar Keshari, Advocate and Mr. Shantanu Majumdar, Advocate. versus RAJEEVSHARMA&ORS Respondents Through: Mr. SanjayGoswami,Advocatefor respondent Nos.2 to 6. + FAO 603/2016and C.M. No.47691/2016(stay) PAWANKUMARPERIWAL Appellant Through: Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary. Advocate with Mr. Yogesh Kumar Keshari, Advocate and Mr. Shantanu Majumdar, Advocate. versus RAJEEV SHARMA & ORS Respondents Through: Mi'. SanjayGoswami,Advocatefor respondent Nos.2 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLEMR. JUSTICEVALMIKIJ.MEHTA