- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 9 November 2017
- Bench
- A.K. Pathak
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 2765/2017
Judgment
ORDER %? 09.11.2017 Both the above captioned petitions, that is, Cr1. M.C. 2135/2017 and Cr1. M.C. 2765/2017 are offshoot of FIR 552/1998 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B IPC registered at Police Station Hauz Khas. It is submitted that petitioners in both these petitions namely Sh. Moti Nankani and Smt, Rekha Nankani in Cr1 MC 2135/2017 and Sh. Mahesh Chander in Cr1 MC 2765/2017 have settled their disputes amicably with respondent no.2 Sh. Khajan Singh Aggarwal before the 241h April, 2017, therefore, Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, Delhi on the aforementioned FIR may be quashed. Petitioner Sh. Mahesh Chander is a patwari. Disputes arose between petitioners in Crl.M.C. 2135/2017 and respondent no.2 with respect to a property deal which led to registration of the aforementioned FIR. Matter has now been settled between the parties. True copy of Mediation Settlement report containing terms of settlement is on record (Annexure P-3). Respondent no.2 is present in the Court and has been identified by Insp Bejay of Police Station EOW Cell. He says that he has settled the matter with petitioners out of his own free will, voluntarily and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. He says that terms of settlement have already been complied with and he has no objection if the FIR against the petitioners is quashed. Affidavit of respondent no.2 is also on record. Respondent no.2 has identified his signatures on his affidavit. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as detailed above, and particularly the factum of settlement arrived at between the parties before the Mediation Centre, in the interest of justice, FIR 552/1998 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B IPC registered at Police Station Hauz Khas and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Both these petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. A.K. PATHAK, J NOVEMBER 099 2017 sm
Case details
Parties and counsel
$29 & 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +? CRL.M.C. 2 135/2017 MOTI NANKANI @ MOTILAL NANKANI & ANR .....Petitioners Through Mr. J R Priani, Adv versus ? Respondents STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State +? CRL.M.C. 2765/2017 ? Petitioner MAHESH CHANDER Through? Mr. Pritpal Singh, Adv versus ? .....Respondents STATE OF NCT OF DELHI& ANR Through Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State Insp Bejay,PS BOW CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.