- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 31 October 2017
- Bench
- S. Ravindra Bhat, Sanjeev Sachdeva
- Case no.
- ITA 915/2017
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S. Ravindra BhatFollow Sanjeev Sachdeva
Judgment
O R D E R %
31.10.2017
Four questions have been urged by the Revenue in this appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1978. First and second pertain to royalty and technical guidance fee as well as model fee. The question is no longer res integra. It is covered by the decision of this Court in CIT v. Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 372 ITR 481.
The third question relates to treatment of export commission which was decided recently by the Division Bench in ITA No.923/2015, decided on 08.05.2017.
The last issue pertains to allowance of additional depreciation. The ITAT, we notice, has decided the assessee's case for another year; that decision has become final.
Having regard to the above position, the Court is of the opinion that no substantial question of law arises; the appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
OCTOBER 31, 2017/vikas/ SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 915/2017 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. versus M/S HERO MOTOCORP LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kavita Jha with Ms. Shivani Khandekar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.