Lakshman Shah v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr

O R D E R %

09.11.2017

Arguing counsel for the petitioner is not available. Proxy counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he does not have file with him. On the last date of hearing also, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

Earlier on 20.09.2017, 30.08.2017, 28.08.2017, 25.07.2017, the matter has been adjourned at the request of counsel for the petitioner.

We are of the view that the petitioner does not seem to be interested in pursuing this matter. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly.

G.S.SISTANI, J

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J NOVEMBER 09, 2017/ck/

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12012/2016 & C.M. Appl. No.1803/2017 LAKSHMAN SHAH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Devendra Kumar, proxy counsel for Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv. for petitioner. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Virendra Singh with Ms.Puja Kalra, Adv. for North MCD. Mr.R.N. Dubey, Adv. for applicant in C.M. Appl. No.1803/2017. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO