Aravali Private Industrial Training Institute v. Directorate General of Employment & Training & Anr

ORDER %

02.09.2015 L The counsel for the petitionersstates that the respondentNo.3 Govt. of State of Rajasthan,vide letter dated 31®^ August, 2015 addressedto the respondent No.l Union of India (UOI) and enclosing a copy of the Inter-Departmental letter also dated 31^' August, 2015, has permitted considerationof all applicationsfor accreditationreceivedon or before20^^ January, 2015, subject to the applicant institutions commencing imparting education in at least four trades, by August, 2017. It is further stated that the petitioner in all the three petitions had submitted the applications for accreditationbefore 20^*^ January, 2015 and are agreeableto the condition subject to which consideration of their application has been permitted and thus the petitioner in each of the petitions is entitled to accreditation / consideration for accreditation.

¶2The counsel for the respondent No.3 State of Rajasthan confirms the said position. Page 2 of4 A

¶3The counselfor the respondentNo.2NationalAccreditationBoardfor Education & Training (NABET) states that though it is bound by the directions of the respondent No.l UOI but the process of grant of accreditation for the present session is already over and it is for the respondent No.l UOI to take a decision on the communications aforesaid of the respondentNo.3 State of Rajasthanand whether, in pursuancethereto, the petitioners herein are to be considered for accreditation.

¶4Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, counsel for the respondent No.l UOI in W.P.(C) No.436l/2015states that in view of the aforesaid stand of the respondent No.3 State of Rajasthan, the respondent No.2 NABET would be entitled to consider the applications for accreditation of the petitioners.

¶5However, Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, Advocate appearing for the respondent No.l UOI in the other two matters states that the respondent No. 1 UOI would have to take a decision on the aforesaid communications of the respondent No.3 State of Rajasthan. The counsel for the respondent No.2 NABET also joins in the said contention.

¶6The counselfor the petitionerscontrovertsthat the time is over. It is statedthatthe lastdate for admissionis 17* September,2015.

¶7'At this stage, Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Advocate also states that the processof considerationfor accreditationcanbegin.

¶8It is obvious that the respondent No.2 NABET now has the concurrenceof the respondentNo.1 UOI to proceedwith the consideration of the applicationsof the petitionersfor accreditation. Page 3 of4 r N- \

¶9Accordingly,thesepetitionsare disposedof directingthe respondents N0.I&2 to, in accordancewith lawandsubjectto the petitioners/ applicants givingundertakingto commenceimpartingtrainingqua at least four trades by August, 2017 and complying with all the requisite formalities / requirements,consider the applicationsof the petitioners for accreditation, within the shortest possible time, so that the petitioners, if found entitled to accreditation, are able to admit students in the current academic year. Copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. ^ SEPTEMBER 02,2015 'bs' RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW, J. Page 4 of4

$-51 to 53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 51+ W.P.(C) No. 4363/2015 SHYAMPRIVATEINDUSTRIALTRAINING institute Petitioner Through: Mr. RatishKumar,Adv. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT ,&TRAINING(DGE&T)&ANR .... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Vikas Chopra, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Mr. Ankit Shah and Mr. Puneet Parihar, Advs. for R-3/State of Rajasthan. AND 52+ W.P.(C)No. 7078/2015& CMNo.12971/2015(for interimdirection). BANSUR PRIVATE INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE Petitioner Through: Mr. Ratish Kumar, Adv. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING (DGE&T), MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT & ANR. Respondent Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1. Mr. Vikas Chopra, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Mr. Ankit Shah and Mr. Puneet Parihar, Advs. for R-3/State of Rajasthan. AND 53+ W.P.(C) No. 7092/2015 & CM No.12994/2015 (for interim direction). ARAVALI PRIVATE INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE Petitioner Page 1 of4 1" Through: Mr. RatishKumar,Adv. versus DIRECTORATEGENERALOF EMPLOYMENT &TRAINING&ANR Respondents Through: Mr. DevP. Bhardwaj,CGSC for R-1. Mr. Vikas Chopra, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Mr. Ankit Shah and Mr. Puneet Parihar, Advs. for R-3/State of Rajasthan. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW