- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 15 November 2017
- Bench
- A.K. Pathak
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3371/2017
Judgment
O R D E R %
15.11.2017 Petitioner seeks permission to go to United States of America to meet his daughter, who is settled there. It is submitted that petitioner's daughter got married in 2016 and is facing lot of emotional and adjustment problem at the new place. Accordingly, presence of petitioner is necessary. Keeping in view the fact that trial is pending for the last 20 years and is at the fag-end, inasmuch as prosecution has commenced arguments. Absence of any accused would further drag on the trial. Permission to leave the country is not accorded to the petitioner. Petition is dismissed.
A.K. PATHAK, J. NOVEMBER 15, 2017 r.bararia
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3371/2017 B SANJEEV RAO ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Satish Tamta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Puneet Rai, Ms. Nisha Narayanan, Mr. Abhishek Vikram and Mr. Shariq Iqbal, Advs. Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through Attendance slip not given CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.