Sudesh Gulati v. Dr Charanjeet Gandhi & Anr

ORDER %

09.09.2015

¶1After brief submission, the learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly states that she is not pressing the present revision petitions in case a direction is given to the learned Additional Rent Controller (ARC) for expeditious disposal of the petition.

¶2Having regard to the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, both the petitions are dismissed as not pressed. However, it is expected that the learned ARC shall decide the eviction petitions as Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared the digital data is as per the physical file expeditiouslyas possible and preferablywithin a period of oneyear.

¶3With these directions both the revision petitions stand disposed of.

¶4Pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶5Copy of the order be given Dasti to the learned counsel for the petitioner. A copy of the order be also sent to the learned ARC for information. SEPTEMBER 09, 2015 vk C-T

V.K. SHALI, J.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 480/2015 & CM APPL.18883-84/2015 SUDESH GULATI Petitioner Through: Ms. Anita Sahani,Advocatewith Mr. Shivom Garg, Adv. & Ms. Seema Saini, Adv. Versus DR CHARANJEET GANDHI & ANR Respondents Through: + RC.REV. 483/2015 & CM APPL. 18891-92/2015 SUDESH GULATI ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Anita Sahani,Advocate with Mr. Shivom Garg, Adv. & Ms. Seema Saini, Adv. Versus PARVINDER SINGH ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K SHALI