Ramakoteswara Rao Kommalapati v. State & Anr

$-A1/43/45/52 ? * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI 'AT NEW DELHI ? + CRLM.C. 3471/2017 & Cr!. M.A. no. 14143/2017 NSL ENERGY VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Mr.Abhishek Saket, Mr. Manish Mudhkur, Mr. Rahul Dubey and Mr. Hitesh Kumar Saini, Advs. versus Respondents ?STATE & ANR Through Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the Respondent no. 1 Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mayank Mishra and Mr. Ritunjay Gupta, Advs. for respondent no. 2 mc CRL.M.C. 3473/2017 & Cr!. M.A. no. 14147/2017 Petitioner MANDAVA RAO PRABHAKAR? Through Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Mr.Abhishek Saket, Mr. Manish Mudhkur, Mr. Rahul Dubey and Mr. Hitesh Kumar Saini, Advs. versus Respondents STATE & ANR? Through Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the Respondent no. 1 Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mayank Mishra and Mr. Ritunjay Gupta, Advs. for respondent no.2 ~r CRL.M.C. 3475/2017 & Cr!. M.A. no. 14151/2017 +? Petitioner MANDAVA ASHAPRIYA Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Through Mr.Abhishek Saket, Mr. Manish Mudhkur, Mr. Rahu! Dubey and Mr. Hitesh Kumar Saini, Advs. versus Respondents ?STATE & ANR Through Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for the Respondent no. 1 Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mayank Mishra and Mr. Ritunjay Gupta, Advs. for respondent no: 2 CRLM.C. 3482/2017 & Cr!. M.A. no. 14165/2017 +? RAMAKOTESWARA RAO KOMIMALAPATI .....Petitioner Through Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, I? Ivlr.Abhishek Saket, Mr. Manish Mudhkur, Mr. Rahul Dubey and Mr. Hitesh Kumar Saini, Advs. versus Respondents STATE & ANR? Through Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the Respondent no. 1 Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mayank Mishra and Mr. Ritunjay Gupta, Advs. for respondent no. 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK ORDER

06.11.2017 %? Learned Senior Counsel for the respondent no. 2 submits that respondent no. 2 (complainant) is not willing to pursue its complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 filed before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate and shall take steps to withdraw the same. In view of this statement, these petitions are disposed of. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous. I?

A.K. PA HAK, J. NOVEMBER 06,2017 r. bararia NI