VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2017 › High Court of Delhi

Hari Kishan & Anr v. Farzana & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
7 November 2017
Bench
R.K.Gaubaauthor
Case no.
MAC.APP. 720/2015

Judgment

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

¶1By the impugned judgment dated 24.07.2015, the tribunal had granted compensation, apportioning the award amongst the seven claimants, shown in the array as respondents in the appeal. On

07.04.2016, it was pointed out by the counsel representing the other claimants that the sixth respondent had passed away. The appellants took adjournment for taking appropriate steps. This request being repeatedly made, the matter was adjourned by the Joint Registrar awaiting appropriate application on several dates including

28.07.2016, 28.11.2016, 23.03.2017 and finally on 20.07.2017. No steps having been taken, the Joint Registrar has passed the last order placing this case before this court with the opinion that the appeal has abated qua the said respondent.

MAC Appeal No. 720/15

¶2Since the cause of action was common, no steps having been taken to substitute the deceased respondent, the appeal would abate. These proceedings are accordingly closed.

¶3The amount deposited by the appellant in terms of order dated

16.09.2015 shall be passed over by the registry to the tribunal with accrued interest for further necessary directions towards satisfaction of award. The tribunal may be approached by the claimants by appropriate application with regard to the allocation of the share of the deceased sixth respondent.

¶4The statutory deposit shall be refunded.

¶5The appeal is disposed of in above terms.

R.K.GAUBA, J. NOVEMBER 7, 2017 umang

Case details

Parties and counsel

MAC Appeal No. 720/15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: 7th November, 2017 + MAC.APP. 720/2015 HARI KISHAN & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Adv. versus FARZANA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.