VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2017 › High Court of Delhi

Sanskriti Homeopathic Medical College & Hospital v. Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy (Ayush) and Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
31 October 2017
Bench
Indermeet Kaurauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 8011/2017

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Indermeet Kaur

Judgment

O R D E R %

31.10.2017

The petitioner submits that in the terms of the Homeopathy Central Council Act, 1973, Chapter II A, Section 12A(a) postulates that in any case if the Scheme is defective and does not contain any necessary particulars, a reasonable opportunity has to be granted to a person or the medical institution concerned to make a written representation and it shall be open to such a person or medical institution to rectify the defects, if any, as specified by the Central Council. The submission of the learned senior counsel for the petitioner on this count is that averments made in the present writ petition be treated as written representation to the Department and he be granted an opportunity to rectify the defects, if any, as and when specified by the Central Council. Respondent No. 1 has put in appearance on the last date. He had been granted time to file counter affidavit. Needful has not been done. Respondent No. 1 is represented through counsel. Accordingly, this writ petition be treated as representation in terms of the aforenoted provision of law as contained in the Homeopathy Central Council Act, 1973. The representation of the petitioner shall be answered in accordance with law by respondent No. 1 within an outer limit of 6 weeks from today for the year 2018-19 and the defects as specified by the Central Council shall be informed to the petitioner institution which would then be granted liberty to rectify the same.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

INDERMEET KAUR, J OCTOBER 31, 2017 SU

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8011/2017 SANSKRITI HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Kirti Uppal, Sr Adv with Mr Chander Shekhar, Mr Sidharth Chopra and Mr Pranvir Sethi, Advs versus MINISTRY OF AYURVEDA, YOGA & NATUROPATHY UNANI, SIDDHA AND HOMEOPATHY (AYUSH) AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr Kundan Kr Mishra, Mr Ajay Kr and Mr Akshay Srivastava, Advs for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.