VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2017 › High Court of Delhi

Ritesh Kumar & Ors v. State & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
8 November 2017
Bench
A.K. Pathakauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 3909/2017

Judgment

ORDER %

08.11.2017 By these petitions, petitioners have prayed for quashing of the following cross FIRs:- FIR No. 361/2014 under Sections 34 1/354/509/34 IPC is registered at Police Station Kalyan Pun, Delhi, on the complaint of Geeta Devi (wife of Sh.Muneem Chaudhary) in Cr1. M.C. No. 3909/20 17. FIR No. 359/2014 under Sections 323/354B/509 IPC registered at Police Station Kalyanpuri on the complaint of Sapna Kumar (respondent no. 2) in Cr1. MC No. 3911/2017. It is submitted that petitioners (accused) and respondent no. 2 (complainants) in both the petitions are living in the same locality and are known to each other. A perusal of FIRs shows that a quarrel took place on some trivial issue, which led to a registration of the aforesaid cross FIRs. Petitioners and private respondents have now settled their disputes amicably in order to maintain harmonioUs relations in future. They say that they have settled the matter of their own free will, voluntarily and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. Complainants Geeta Devi and Sapna Kumar are present in Court and have been identified by S.I.Shyam Lal of police station Kalyanpuri. They submit that they are not willing to pursue the FIRs any further and both the FIRs may be quashed. Keeping in view the above fact that petitioners and private respondents have now settled their disputes amicably in order to maintain harmonious relations in future, in the interest of justice both the FIRs, that is, FIR No. 361/2014 under Sections 341/354/509/34 IPC and FIR No. 359/2014 under Section 323/354B /509 IPC, both registered at Police Station Kalyanpuri and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Both the petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous. Dasti. A.K. ATHAK, J NOVEMBER 089 2017 PS

Case details

Parties and counsel

$-3lI32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3909/2017 and CRL.M.C. 3911/2017 RITESH KUMAR & ORS Petitioners Through Mr.Anurag Saxena, Adv. with Ms.Usha Srivastava, Adv. versus STATE & ANR Respondent Through Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State SI Shyam Lal, SI Vipin Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri AND CRL.M.C. 391 1/2017 MUNEEM CHAUDHARY & ANR Petitioners Through Ms.Jyoti Gupta, Adv. versus STATE & ANR Respondent Through Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State SI Shyam Lal, SI Vipin Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.