Pawan Chhokra v. The State ( NCT of Delhi)

O R D E R %

10.11.2016

¶1Learned counsel for the petitioner informs that in compliance of the order dated 20.07.2016, costs `10,000/- have since been deposited.

¶2Again steps have not been taken by the petitioner in compliance of the order dated 20.07.2016. Notice to the complainant could not be issued for want of process fee. On perusal of the file it reveals that the petitioner has miserably failed to comply with the orders

07.09.2015,

01.12.2015,

11.03.2016 and

20.07.2016. Imposition of costs of `10,000/- for not taking steps for service on the complainant had no effect upon him.

¶3Considering the non-compliance of the orders on various dates despite grant of interim protection, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

S.P.GARG, J. NOVEMBER 10, 2016 /sa

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1853/2015 PAWAN CHHOKRA ..... Petitioner Through : Ms.Shubhi Gupta, proxy counsel. versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghei, APP. SI Arun Lal, PS Subji Mandi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG