VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2017 › High Court of Delhi

Marri Amma @ Lissy & Anr v. Uma Shukla

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
31 October 2017
Bench
Valmiki J. Mehtaauthor
Case no.
RSA 252/2017

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Valmiki J. Mehta

Judgment

O R D E R %

31.10.2017

¶1Learned counsel for the appellants has taken instructions from the appellants who are present in person. He states that the appeal be disposed of as not pressed but the appellants be granted time to vacate the suit premises on or before 31.12.2018. It is also stated that the appellants will clear all charges towards electricity, water, etc. as payable with respect to the suit premises till the appellants are in possession of the suit premises.

¶2Let the appellants file their affidavits of undertaking in terms of the present order within a period of two weeks from today and on the appellants filing the undertaking and complying with the terms of the same the appellants will have benefit of the decree of possession not being executed against them till 31.12.2018.

¶3The appeal is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid observations. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J OCTOBER 31, 2017/AK

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 252/2017 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 38904-05/2017 MARRI AMMA @ LISSY & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ajit Nair, Advocate. versus UMA SHUKLA ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.