VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2017 › High Court of Delhi

Sanjay Khattar v. Amandeep Kalia & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
3 November 2017
Bench
Valmiki J. Mehtaauthor
Case no.
RFA 912/2017

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Valmiki J. Mehta

Judgment

O R D E R %

03.11.2017 Caveat No.941/2017

¶1Counsel appears for the caveators. Caveat accordingly stands discharged. +RFA No.912/2017 and C.M. Nos.39295/2017 (stay) & 39296/2017 (exemption)

¶2After arguments, this appeal is disposed of as not pressed as the appellant states that appellant will vacate the suit premises on or before

30.4.2018. It is also stated that appellant will continue to pay any charges for use of electricity, water etc till the time the appellant continues to stay in the suit premises. Counsels for the parties also agree that rate of mesne profits granted by the trial court will stand reduced to Rs.10,000/- per month and interest payable on arrears will also stand reduced from 9% per annum to 6% per annum subject to the condition that the arrears of the mesne profits at Rs.10,000/- per month in terms of the impugned judgment are cleared by the appellant on or before 31.12.2017.

¶3Let the appellant file an affidavit of undertaking in this Court in terms of the present order within two weeks and on the appellant filing the undertaking and complying with the terms of the same, appellant will have time to vacate the suit premises on or before 30.4.2018.

¶4Appeal is accordingly disposed of in terms of aforesaid observations, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J NOVEMBER 03, 2017 Ne

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 912/2017 SANJAY KHATTAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Viraj R. Dattar, Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Narang, Advocate. versus AMANDEEP KALIA AND ANR. .... Respondents Through: Ms. Manmeet Arora, Advocate with Ms. Nidhi Parashar, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.