- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 1 November 2017
- Bench
- Vibhu Bakhru
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 9669/2017
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Vibhu Bakhru
Judgment
O R D E R %
01.11.2017 CM No.39383/2017
¶1Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
¶2The application is disposed of. WP(C) No.9669/2017 & CM No.39382/2017
¶3The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the decision taken by the respondents in the meeting held on 27.09.2017, whereby they have decided to invoke SDR / outside SDR scheme qua petition no. 1.
¶2It is an admitted case that the petitioner no.1 company has been unable to pay its debts and has defaulted in making payments due to the respondents. In this view, prima facie, the respondents - being the creditors of petitioner no.1 company - are at liberty to take such measures in respect of the affairs of the petitioner no.1 company as they deem fit.
¶3Mr. Chandhiok, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners states that the petitioners would be satisfied if a direction is passed to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representations made on 09.10.2017 and 13.10.2017 in the ensuing meeting of the creditors scheduled to be held tomorrow.
¶3This request cannot be objected to and, therefore, this Court directs the respondents to consider the petitioners' representations and take an informed decision thereon.
¶4Mr. Chandhiok further states that the petitioners have recently received minutes of the meeting of the Standing Committee of Power and Procurement of State of Haryana, held on 26.09.2017. He states that these minutes are also relevant for the respondents to consider the petitioners' representations. The copy of the same has been handed over to the learned Additional Solicitor General. The said minutes may also be taken into account by the respondents while considering the aforementioned representations.
¶5The petition along with pending application are disposed of with the aforesaid directions.
¶6Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master. VIBHU BAKHRU, J NOVEMBER 01, 2017 nd
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9669/2017 DANS ENERGY PVT LTD AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. A. S. Chandhiok, Senior Advocate and Mr. Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atul Guleriya, Advocate. versus POWER FINANCE CORPORATION LTD AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Milanka Chaudhary, Ms. Naina Dubey, Mr. Rajul Jain & Mr. Madhur, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Vivek Jain with Mr. Sunil Dalal, Advocates for R-3/ PNB. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.