Capt. Tanushri Mathur v. Union of India and Anr

O R D E R %

10.11.2017 CM APPL. 40569/2017

¶1Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶2The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 9958/2017 and CM APPL. 40568/2017

¶3Ms Anjana Gosain, learned counsel appearing for respondents who appears on advance notice has raised the preliminary objection. She states that the petitioner has an equally efficacious statutory remedy by filing an appeal under Rule 3B of the Aircraft Rules, 1937.

¶4In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file an appeal before the concerned authority without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner.

¶5Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. VIBHU BAKHRU, J NOVEMBER 10, 2017/RK

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9958/2017 CAPT. TANUSHRI MATHUR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Raman Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr Somesh Arora and Mr Aditya Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms Anjana Gosain and Ms Rabiya Thakur, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU