- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 9 November 2017
- Bench
- A.K. Pathak
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 4602/2017
Judgment
O R D E R %
09.11.2017 Respondent no.2 is present in Court and has been identified by SI Subhash of police station Sonia Vihar. She submits that she has settled the matter with the petitioner vide Settlement/Compromise Deed dated 13th February, 2017 of her own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. She further submits that her marriage with the petitioner no.1 has already been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent dated 22nd September, 2017 passed by Family Court, North East District, Delhi. Respondent no.2 submits that entire settled amount stands paid. She has no objection in case FIR is quashed. Keeping in mind that petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have settled their disputes amicably, inasmuch as, their marriage has also been dissolved by mutual consent, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 0058/14 under Sections 498A IPC registered at police station Sonia Vihar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
A.K. PATHAK, J. NOVEMBER 09, 2017 ga
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4602/2017 RAVINDER SEORAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Subhash, P.S. Sonia Vihar. Mr. Tarun Verma, Adv. for R-2 along with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.