- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 10 November 2017
- Bench
- Vibhu Bakhru
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 9989/2017
Judgment
O R D E R %
10.11.2017
¶1The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly states that the issue raised in the present petition is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in M/s Layba MNS Health and Beauty Spa Pvt. Ltd. v. The Janpath Hotel and Ors.: W.P.(C) 9817/2017, decided on 07.11.2017 and is liable to be disposed of in similar terms.
¶2The petitioner claims that they have already made a request for being relocated. ITDC is directed to consider the aforesaid request/demand of the petitioner and take an appropriate decision, thereon. ITDC shall communicate its decision to the petitioners in this regard within a period of two weeks from today. If dissatisfied with the decision of ITDC, the petitioner would be at liberty to take such remedies as available in law.
¶3The petition and pending application are disposed of with the above observations. VIBHU BAKHRU, J NOVEMBER 10, 2017/RK
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9989/2017 and CM No. 40732/2017 M/S MANOHAR LALL BUJJAN MALL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Uttam Datt, Ms Riya Gulati and Mr Tarun Sharma, Advocates. versus THE JANPATH HOTEL AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Sushant Kumar and Mr Anitesh Sharma, Advocates for R-1 and 2. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC/UOI for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.