VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

L & T Finance Limited v. Sanjay Rocks Granites India Pvt Ltd (Borrower) & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
4 November 2016
Bench
S. Muralidharauthor
Case no.
O.M.P.(I) 577/2015

Judgment

O R D E R %

04.11.2016

¶1Fresh notice was issued on 5th September, 2016 to the Respondents through all modes, yet there is no affidavit of dasti service or an affidavit enclosing the tracking report of the courier agency.

¶2Learned counsel for the Petitioner is unable to inform the court whether the arbitrator has already been appointed.

¶3In the event that an arbitrator has already been appointed, the interim order dated 12th October, 2015 is directed to continue till such time the arbitrator varies or modifies it on an application being filed under Section 17 of the Act.

¶4In the event no arbitrator has yet been appointed, the order dated 12th October, 2015 is directed to continue for a period of four weeks from today by which time the Petitioner should take steps to have an O.M.P.(I) 577/2015

arbitrator appointed. In other words, if no steps are taken within four weeks as directed for the appointment of an arbitrator, the interim order dated 12th October, 2015 will come to an end on the expiry of four weeks from today.

¶5The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

S.MURALIDHAR, J. NOVEMBER 04, 2016 'AA'

O.M.P.(I) 577/2015

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) 577/2015 L & T FINANCE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Chadan Kr. Pandey, proxy counsel. versus SANJAY ROCKS GRANITES INDIA PVT LTD (BORROWER) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Nemo. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.