- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 31 October 2017
- Bench
- Valmiki J. Mehta
- Case no.
- FAO 394/2015
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Valmiki J. Mehta
Judgment
O R D E R %
31.10.2017
¶1After arguments this appeal is allowed with the consent order that the impugned order dated 2.9.2015 is set aside and the legal heirs of the defendant are brought on record. Amended memo of parties has already been filed before the trial court and the same is taken on record. Appeal is however allowed subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/- to the respondent and which costs shall be paid positively within four weeks from today.
¶2Parties to appear before District & Sessions Judge (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi on 30th November, 2017 and the District & Sessions FAO No.394/2015 Judge will mark the suit for disposal to a competent court in accordance with law.
¶3Appeal is disposed of in terms of aforesaid observations. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J OCTOBER 31, 2017 Ne FAO No.394/2015
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 394/2015 and C.M. No.26734/2015 (stay) MADHU BHATIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. G.P. Thareja, Advocate with Ms. Sakshi Bhayana, Advocate. versus PRITHVI RAJ ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Malhotra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.