- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 26 October 2016
- Bench
- Vipin Sanghi
- Case no.
- BAIL APPLN. 2625/2015
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Vipin Sanghi
Judgment
O R D E R %
27.02.2017
A communication has been received from the learned ASJ in terms of the order dated 26.10.2016. A perusal of the said communication dated
10.02.2017 shows that several accused persons, who are in custody, were not produced before the Court. It is the obligation of the State to produce the accused, who are in custody, on the dates fixed before the Trial Court so that the recording of evidence is not hampered. The State is directed to ensure that the accused, who are in custody, are produced before the Court on the dates fixed before the Court. In case they are not produced for any specific reason, the reason should be placed before the Trial Court and the Trial Court should also examine the justification offered and record the same in the order. Let a further status report be sent by the Trial Court with regard to the progress in the case on or before 22.05.2017.
VIPIN SANGHI, J FEBRUARY 27, 2017 B.S. Rohella
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2625/2015 VINOD @ GOLA ..... Petitioner Through: versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.