- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 2 November 2016
- Bench
- Sanjiv Khanna, Sunita Gupta
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 10441/2015
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Sanjiv KhannaFollow Sunita Gupta
Judgment
O R D E R %
02.11.2016
After some hearing, the petitioner, who appears in person, seeks liberty to withdraw the present writ petition and impugn the order dated 18th November, 2015 passed by the competent authority. The petitioner states that while challenging the said order, he would also like to rely upon the averments made in paragraphs 4.26 and 4.52 to
4.57 of the OA No.2095/2014.
In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to raise all contentions and issues including the contentions raised in the aforesaid paragraphs of OA No.2095/2014 if he is so advised while challenging the order dated 18th November, 2015. The petitioner still has period of limitation to file the OA. We clarify that we have not expressed any opinion on merits.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
SUNITA GUPTA, J. NOVEMBER 02, 2016 NA
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10441/2015 TUSHAR RANJAN MOHANTY ..... Petitioner In person. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.